California vs Colorado
Federal spending comparison
California’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $39.5B; Colorado’s is $8.1B. Colorado files only 91,723 awards against California’s 639,340 — a thin tape on an $8.1B stock. Census counts are 5,957,493 in Colorado and 39,431,263 in California. Spending per capita is $97.34 versus $135.64. FY2026 obligations are $579.9M in Colorado and $5.3B in California. Nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation leads Colorado; commercial and institutional building construction leads California. The series is obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- California $39.5B vs Colorado $8.1B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- Colorado files only 91,723 awards vs California’s 639,340.
- Per capita: California $135.64 vs Colorado $97.34 on 39,431,263 vs 5,957,493 residents.
- FY2026 $5.3B vs $579.9M; chartered freight air leads Colorado.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
91,723 awards on $8.1B
Colorado’s award count is the distinctive fact. 91,723 actions on $8.1B is a concentrated file relative to California’s 639,340 actions on $39.5B. Colorado’s row count is about 14 percent of California’s; its dollar stock is about 20 percent. The Mountain West tape is dollar-heavy relative to rows. The packet does not publish average award size. The contrast is enough to flag concentration.
Colorado’s lead NAICS is nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation. A charter-freight peak is consistent with large airlift bookings rather than a high-frequency services tape. California’s commercial-construction peak sits inside a much larger 639,340-row mix.
Colorado’s $8.1B charter-freight stock on 5,957,493 residents is a concentrated 91,723-row airlift file; California’s $39.5B construction-led stock on 39,431,263 residents remains larger in dollars and warmer at $135.64 versus $97.34. FY2026 of $579.9M versus $5.3B does not reorder that ranking.
Charter freight versus federal buildings
Nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation and commercial and institutional building construction are different NAICS families. Colorado’s $8.1B charter-freight peak is a logistics-airlift mix. California’s $39.5B construction peak is a facilities mix. The packet names those peaks; it does not give shares.
Use the California and Colorado state hubs for agencies and recipients. Cite USAspending.gov. Do not treat the charter-freight peak as an outlay category. The 91,723 and 639,340 rows include many other codes.
Full analysis: California vs Colorado on USAspending: $39.5B against $8.1B →
Questions
- Does California or Colorado have more federal spending?
- California leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $39.5B to Colorado’s $8.1B. California also leads spending per capita, $135.64 versus $97.34, on 39,431,263 residents against Colorado’s 5,957,493. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 91,723 in Colorado. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $579.9M in Colorado.
- Why does Colorado have so few awards on $8.1B?
- The packet reports 91,723 awards in Colorado on $8.1B versus 639,340 in California on $39.5B. Colorado’s lead industry is nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation, a mix that can concentrate dollars in fewer airlift actions. Spending per capita is $97.34 versus $135.64. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
- What industries lead in California and Colorado?
- California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Colorado’s is nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $39.5B and $8.1B. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 91,723 in Colorado. Those peaks are mix labels on the stacked stocks, not inventories of every award.
- Are California vs Colorado figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $39.5B and $8.1B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $579.9M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($135.64 vs $97.34) uses Census population where present. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| California | Metric | Colorado |
|---|---|---|
| $222.27B | Total Spending | $27.81B |
| $6K | Per Capita | $5K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 39.4M | Population | 6.0M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — California
- Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
- Social Security Administration$397.49B
- Department of Defense$301.91B
- Department of Energy$116.54B
- Department of Agriculture$85.61B
Top Agencies — Colorado
- Department of Defense$63.98B
- Social Security Administration$61.96B
- Department of Health and Human Services$57.66B
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration$22.31B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$15.38B
Top Industries — California
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
- DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
- COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B
Top Industries — Colorado
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$15.76B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY$10.31B
- NONSCHEDULED CHARTERED FREIGHT AIR TRANSPORTATION$10.08B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$9.18B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$9.12B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · California · Colorado