California vs Georgia
Federal spending comparison
California’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $39.5B; Georgia’s is $9.7B. California’s 39,431,263 residents produce $135.64 per capita; Georgia’s 11,180,878 produce $95.66. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 278,028 in Georgia. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $1.1B in Georgia. Commercial and institutional building construction leads California; aircraft manufacturing leads Georgia. The series is obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- California $39.5B vs Georgia $9.7B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- California per capita $135.64 vs Georgia $95.66 on 39,431,263 vs 11,180,878 residents.
- Awards: 639,340 vs 278,028; FY2026 $5.3B vs $1.1B.
- Georgia’s peak is aircraft manufacturing; California’s is commercial construction.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
An aircraft-manufacturing peak on $9.7B
Georgia’s lead NAICS is aircraft manufacturing. That aerospace label sits on $9.7B against California’s $39.5B commercial-construction peak. The pair is a plane-building mix versus a facilities mix, and a $9.7B stock versus a $39.5B stock. The packet names the peaks; it does not give shares or plant lists.
Georgia files 278,028 awards. California files 639,340. Georgia’s row count is about 43 percent of California’s, while its dollar stock is about 25 percent. The Georgia tape is busy relative to dollars. Cite USAspending.gov.
Georgia’s $9.7B aircraft-manufacturing stock on 11,180,878 residents is a busy 278,028-row aerospace file; California’s $39.5B construction-led stock on 39,431,263 residents remains larger in dollars and warmer at $135.64 versus $95.66. FY2026 of $1.1B versus $5.3B does not reorder that ranking.
Four times the people, four times the dollars — almost
California’s 39,431,263 residents are about 3.5 times Georgia’s 11,180,878. California’s $39.5B is about 4.1 times Georgia’s $9.7B. The multiples are close, which is why per capita of $135.64 versus $95.66 is a moderate intensity gap rather than a inversion. California leads on both scale and intensity.
Keep those per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations. They are not outlays per resident. Place-of-performance for aircraft manufacturing can sit at an assembly line. The packet does not reallocate suppliers.
Full analysis: California vs Georgia on USAspending: $39.5B against $9.7B →
Questions
- Does California or Georgia have more federal spending?
- California leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $39.5B to Georgia’s $9.7B. California also leads spending per capita, $135.64 versus $95.66, on 39,431,263 residents against Georgia’s 11,180,878. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 278,028 in Georgia. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $1.1B in Georgia.
- What is Georgia’s lead industry versus California?
- Georgia’s top industry is aircraft manufacturing. California’s is commercial and institutional building construction. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $9.7B and $39.5B. Award counts are 278,028 in Georgia and 639,340 in California. The figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
- Does Georgia have a high award count relative to its dollars?
- Georgia files 278,028 awards on $9.7B against California’s 639,340 on $39.5B. Georgia’s row share is larger than its dollar share. Spending per capita is $95.66 versus $135.64. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
- Are California vs Georgia figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $39.5B and $9.7B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $1.1B, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($135.64 vs $95.66) uses Census population where present. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| California | Metric | Georgia |
|---|---|---|
| $222.27B | Total Spending | $48.93B |
| $6K | Per Capita | $4K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 39.4M | Population | 11.2M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — California
- Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
- Social Security Administration$397.49B
- Department of Defense$301.91B
- Department of Energy$116.54B
- Department of Agriculture$85.61B
Top Agencies — Georgia
- Social Security Administration$120.90B
- Department of Health and Human Services$89.19B
- Department of Defense$42.51B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$25.38B
- Department of Agriculture$20.00B
Top Industries — California
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
- DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
- COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B
Top Industries — Georgia
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$13.98B
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$4.72B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$4.68B
- FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES$4.07B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$3.45B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · California · Georgia