Skip to main content

California vs Illinois

Federal spending comparison

California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Illinois shows $15.9B. Illinois still logs 1,544,633 awards against California’s 639,340. Spending per capita is close — $143.78 in Illinois and $135.64 in California — on 12,710,158 and 39,431,263 residents. Illinois’s top industry is all other miscellaneous manufacturing; California’s is commercial and institutional building construction. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $1.8B.

Key figures

  • California $39.5B vs Illinois $15.9B in USAspending obligations.
  • Per capita $135.64 vs $143.78 on 39,431,263 vs 12,710,158 residents.
  • Awards: 639,340 vs 1,544,633; FY2026 $5.3B vs $1.8B.
  • Top industries: commercial and institutional building construction (CA) vs all other miscellaneous manufacturing (IL).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Illinois’s 1.54 million awards on $15.9B

California logs 639,340 awards on $39.5B. Illinois logs 1,544,633 awards on $15.9B. Row volume and dollar stock are different rankings in this pair. A busier file is not automatically the heavier file, and a heavier file is not automatically the busier one. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Readers who sort only by award count will miss $39.5B versus $15.9B. Readers who sort only by dollars will miss 639,340 versus 1,544,633. Hold both. Typical booking size moves with that split: fewer rows on more dollars means a heavier average action, not a moral grade. Illinois’s 1,544,633 awards are more than double California’s 639,340 on less than half the dollars.

Miscellaneous manufacturing vs building construction

Census counts are 39,431,263 in California and 12,710,158 in Illinois. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $143.78. That ratio uses stacked obligations, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. A higher per-person reading means a thicker federal-award intensity on the Census denominator, nothing else.

All other miscellaneous manufacturing as Illinois’s peak is a catch-all manufacturing tag on a crowded row file. Commercial and institutional building construction as California’s peak sits on a heavier $39.5B stock with fewer rows. Population can lead while dollars trail, or the reverse. The table reports both. It does not convert either into outlays.

Full analysis: California vs Illinois on USAspending: $39.5B vs $15.9B, inverted rows →

Questions

Which has more federal spending, California or Illinois?
California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Illinois shows $15.9B. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,544,633. Populations are 39,431,263 and 12,710,158. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $143.78. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $1.8B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
What industries lead California and Illinois federal awards?
California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Illinois’s top industry is all other miscellaneous manufacturing. Those slices sit on $39.5B and $15.9B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 639,340 versus 1,544,633 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.
How do California and Illinois compare on spending per capita?
Spending per capita is $135.64 in California on 39,431,263 residents and $143.78 in Illinois on 12,710,158 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $39.5B and $15.9B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Are California vs Illinois figures Treasury outlays?
No. The $39.5B and $15.9B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $1.8B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,544,633. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between California and Illinois.
CaliforniaMetricIllinois
$222.27BTotal Spending$64.30B
$6KPer Capita$5K
N/A% of GDPN/A
39.4MPopulation12.7M
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — California

  • Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
  • Social Security Administration$397.49B
  • Department of Defense$301.91B
  • Department of Energy$116.54B
  • Department of Agriculture$85.61B

Top Agencies — Illinois

  • Social Security Administration$145.62B
  • Department of Health and Human Services$138.77B
  • Department of Defense$30.68B
  • Department of Energy$29.77B
  • Department of Agriculture$25.00B

Top Industries — California

  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
  • DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
  • COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B

Top Industries — Illinois

  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$24.99B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$2.83B
  • SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVIGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL, AND NAUTICAL SYSTEM AND INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURING$2.69B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$2.33B
  • ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING$2.26B