Skip to main content

California vs Pennsylvania

Federal spending comparison

California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Pennsylvania shows $28.1B. Pennsylvania’s award file is more than twice as busy: 1,468,918 actions against California’s 639,340. Spending per capita also favors Pennsylvania, $239.68 on 13,078,751 residents versus $135.64 on 39,431,263. California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction; Pennsylvania’s is medicinal and botanical manufacturing. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $3.1B.

Key figures

  • California $39.5B vs Pennsylvania $28.1B in USAspending obligations.
  • Per capita $135.64 vs $239.68 on 39,431,263 vs 13,078,751 residents.
  • Awards: 639,340 vs 1,468,918; FY2026 $5.3B vs $3.1B.
  • Top industries: commercial and institutional building construction (CA) vs medicinal and botanical manufacturing (PA).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

1.47 million Pennsylvania awards on $28.1B

California logs 639,340 awards on $39.5B. Pennsylvania logs 1,468,918 awards on $28.1B. Row volume and dollar stock are different rankings in this pair. A busier file is not automatically the heavier file, and a heavier file is not automatically the busier one. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Readers who sort only by award count will miss $39.5B versus $28.1B. Readers who sort only by dollars will miss 639,340 versus 1,468,918. Hold both. Typical booking size moves with that split: fewer rows on more dollars means a heavier average action, not a moral grade. Pennsylvania’s 1,468,918 awards are the row story; California’s $39.5B is the stock story.

Medicinal manufacturing vs building construction

Census counts are 39,431,263 in California and 13,078,751 in Pennsylvania. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $239.68. That ratio uses stacked obligations, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. A higher per-person reading means a thicker federal-award intensity on the Census denominator, nothing else.

Medicinal and botanical manufacturing on a 1,468,918-row Pennsylvania file is a different peak from commercial and institutional building construction on 639,340 California awards. Rows and mix both refuse to copy the dollar ranking. Population can lead while dollars trail, or the reverse. The table reports both. It does not convert either into outlays.

Full analysis: California vs Pennsylvania on USAspending: fewer PA dollars, more PA awards →

Questions

Which has more federal spending, California or Pennsylvania?
California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Pennsylvania shows $28.1B. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,468,918. Populations are 39,431,263 and 13,078,751. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $239.68. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $3.1B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
What industries lead California and Pennsylvania federal awards?
California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Pennsylvania’s top industry is medicinal and botanical manufacturing. Those slices sit on $39.5B and $28.1B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 639,340 versus 1,468,918 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.
How do California and Pennsylvania compare on spending per capita?
Spending per capita is $135.64 in California on 39,431,263 residents and $239.68 in Pennsylvania on 13,078,751 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $39.5B and $28.1B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Are California vs Pennsylvania figures Treasury outlays?
No. The $39.5B and $28.1B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $3.1B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,468,918. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between California and Pennsylvania.
CaliforniaMetricPennsylvania
$222.27BTotal Spending$123.59B
$6KPer Capita$9K
N/A% of GDPN/A
39.4MPopulation13.1M
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — California

  • Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
  • Social Security Administration$397.49B
  • Department of Defense$301.91B
  • Department of Energy$116.54B
  • Department of Agriculture$85.61B

Top Agencies — Pennsylvania

  • Department of Health and Human Services$489.40B
  • Social Security Administration$184.58B
  • Department of Defense$124.00B
  • Department of Agriculture$22.57B
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$17.67B

Top Industries — California

  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
  • DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
  • COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B

Top Industries — Pennsylvania

  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$29.49B
  • POWER BOILER AND HEAT EXCHANGER MANUFACTURING$17.61B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$17.42B
  • MILITARY ARMORED VEHICLE, TANK, AND TANK COMPONENT MANUFACTURING$11.80B
  • MEDICINAL AND BOTANICAL MANUFACTURING$11.30B