Arizona 2nd District

What the IHBG–AZ-02 join is

CFDA 14.867 and congressional district AZ-02 meet here. $608,993,549.20 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Indian Housing Block Grants’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients. 9 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a housing-unit census, a tribal roster, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $608,993,549.20 by 9 yields about $67,665,949.91 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical per-unit cost or a posted per-tribe figure. Nine awards against a six-hundred-nine-million-dollar IHBG cell is a compact file. Do not invent tribes or housing authorities. Do not treat AZ-02’s 14.867 cell as a synonym for every IHBG account nationwide. Open Arizona 2nd District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 14.867 for CFDA 14.867 without the AZ-02 filter, Arizona federal spending for every program in the Arizona extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $608,993,549.20.

CFDA 14.867 as the IHBG side

USAspending labels CFDA 14.867 as Indian Housing Block Grants. That catalog number produced $608,993,549.20 when crossed with Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) place of performance. The program-wide 14.867 hub does not require AZ-02 geography. The district hub does not require IHBG. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 9 awards. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients.

Correlation is not causation: Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) did not “cause” $608,993,549.20 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 14.867 × AZ-02 only. It is not a housing-unit census, a tribal roster, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Questions

How much IHBG spending is coded to Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02)?

USAspending.gov lists $608,993,549.20 in Indian Housing Block Grants obligations across 9 awards with place of performance in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02). CFDA 14.867 × AZ-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Arizona’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 6.4% of the district’s published total ($9,574,996,035.05). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $67,665,949.91, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $608,993,549.20 include every IHBG project in AZ-02?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients. $608,993,549.20 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 14.867 inside AZ-02 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 14.867 and Arizona 2nd District to inspect parent tables. 9 remains an action count, not a count of units, tribes, or households.

Is $608,993,549.20 cash already paid in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $608,993,549.20 as checks already cleared in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 9 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Where is the live IHBG–AZ-02 table?

Arizona 2nd District is the district parent and CFDA 14.867 is the program parent. Arizona federal spending covers Arizona without the district×program intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $608,993,549.20. Place of performance is AZ-02. Obligations are not outlays.