Texas 10th District

A place-of-performance join: Geosciences × TX-10

CFDA 47.050 and congressional district TX-10 meet here. $669,289,812 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Geosciences’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Texas 10th District (TX-10), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split atmospheric, earth, or ocean sciences and does not name campuses. 32 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a field-site map, a campus census, or a named-investigator file.

Dividing $669,289,812 by 32 yields about $20,915,306.62 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical NSF grant size or a posted per-site figure. 32 awards is a compact NSF geosciences file. Do not invent campuses, ships, or principal investigators. Do not treat TX-10’s 47.050 cell as a synonym for every Geosciences account nationwide. Open Texas 10th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 47.050 for CFDA 47.050 without the TX-10 filter, Texas federal spending for every program in the Texas extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $669,289,812.

Geosciences as a CFDA tag, not as a named-vendor list

USAspending labels CFDA 47.050 as Geosciences. That catalog number produced $669,289,812 when crossed with Texas 10th District (TX-10) place of performance. The program-wide 47.050 hub does not require TX-10 geography. The district hub does not require Geosciences. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 32 awards. The packet does not split atmospheric, earth, or ocean sciences and does not name campuses.

Correlation is not causation: Texas 10th District (TX-10) did not “cause” $669,289,812 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 47.050 × TX-10 only. It is not a field-site map, a campus census, or a named-investigator file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Questions

How much Geosciences spending is coded to Texas 10th District (TX-10)?

USAspending.gov lists $669,289,812 in Geosciences obligations across 32 awards with place of performance in Texas 10th District (TX-10). CFDA 47.050 × TX-10 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Texas’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 5.7% of the district’s published total ($11,746,424,273.62). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $20,915,306.62, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $669,289,812 include every Geosciences project in TX-10?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split atmospheric, earth, or ocean sciences and does not name campuses. $669,289,812 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 47.050 inside TX-10 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 47.050 and Texas 10th District to inspect parent tables. 32 remains an action count, not a count of field sites, ships, or investigators.

Is $669,289,812 cash already paid in Texas 10th District (TX-10)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $669,289,812 as checks already cleared in Texas 10th District (TX-10) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 32 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Is Texas 10th District (TX-10) ranked against other Texas districts here?

No. This page does not rank Texas 10th District (TX-10) as a winner or loser. $669,289,812 and 32 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Geosciences and Texas 10th District (TX-10) together without a league table.