Skip to main content
← All data ties

Poultry processing federal obligations in Georgia (NAICS 311615)

One hundred thirty-one poultry-processing awards are coded to Georgia. 131 USAspending.gov awards coded to Poultry Processing (NAICS 311615) and Georgia place of performance carry $123,455,489.22 in federal obligations. 131 awards against $123.5 million is a mid-size poultry-processing cell rather than a residual food-manufacturing dump. Mean obligation per award is about $942,408. The join is NAICS 311615 plus Georgia, not a slaughter census, a 311991 perishable-food total, or an outlay.

Key figures

  • NAICS 311615 in Georgia: $123,455,489.22 across 131 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $942,408 per award, not a typical invoice.
  • 311615 is poultry, not other slaughter or 311991.
  • Cite obligations from USAspending.gov; keep both sides of the join.

NAICS 311615 and Georgia as a poultry join

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $123,455,489.22 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 311615 is poultry processing, not animal (except poultry) slaughtering and not perishable prepared food manufacturing. It is not a statewide spending total and not a national NAICS 311615 total. Those parent tables live on Georgia federal spending and NAICS 311615.

131 awards against $123.5 million is a mid-size poultry-processing cell rather than a residual food-manufacturing dump. 131 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 131 lines. Reading 131 as factories, ships, or clinics in Georgia would confuse actions with establishments.

Georgia industries lists other NAICS codes with GA place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $123,455,489.22. The headline remains $123,455,489.22 on 131 awards for this pair alone.

Poultry processing, not other meat or perishable food

NAICS 311615 is a Census industry code assigned on the award. NAICS 311615 is poultry processing, not animal (except poultry) slaughtering and not perishable prepared food manufacturing. Animal (except poultry) slaughtering (311611) and perishable prepared food manufacturing (311991) are different codes. Those neighboring codes never enter $123,455,489.22 unless they also appear as 311615, which they do not. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the Georgia cell.

Commodity folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars. Unique contractors are unpublished. Dividing $123,455,489.22 by 131 produces about $942,408. That quotient is arithmetic, not a typical Georgia contract. There is no median, no top-award table, and no fiscal-year breakout on this packet. Do not treat the mean as a posted unit price.

Georgia geography on a poultry cell

Georgia place of performance can cover North Georgia plants, South Georgia reporting addresses, or a named processing campus. The packet has no site split. Inside the GA tag, named cities are not broken out. The packet has one state key. A named city can sit inside $123,455,489.22 only if its awards carry NAICS 311615 and GA — which this narrative cannot verify.

Place-of-performance geography is not the same as contractor headquarters. A firm based elsewhere can perform in Georgia, and a Georgia address can appear on work done out of state. This join reports the coded pair, not a logistics map. Georgia federal spending remains the statewide parent.

Obligations versus outlays for Georgia 311615

USAspending obligations are commitments, not checks that have cleared. $123,455,489.22 can include amounts that will be paid later, cancelled, or modified. The packet does not publish outlays. 131 is not a payment count. Quote NAICS 311615 in Georgia as obligations and leave fiscal-year folklore off the citation — years are unpublished here.

What the poultry–Georgia pair does not prove

The poultry–Georgia pair does not prove that Georgia specialized in this industry because of federal demand, or the reverse. Commodity folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars. Unique contractors are unpublished. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards. Keep both sides of the join in any headline: NAICS 311615 and Georgia.

How to cite NAICS 311615 in Georgia

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 311615 (Poultry Processing), Georgia (GA), $123,455,489.22, and 131 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Georgia federal spending, NAICS 311615, Georgia industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $942,408 as a ratio only. Readers who reuse this state-industry snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov as the source, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. The live hubs linked from this page can refresh the snapshot; this narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state. Keep the obligation word on the headline dollar figure in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 311615 obligated in Georgia?
The pair totals $123,455,489.22 across 131 awards, per USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Those are obligations for Poultry Processing inside Georgia coding, not outlays and not every federal dollar in Georgia. Source filings stay on USAspending.gov.
How many poultry awards sit in Georgia?
131 award records produced $123,455,489.22. Concentration or dispersion is visible only as that count against that sum. About $942,408 per award is $123,455,489.22 divided by 131, not a typical Georgia purchase. The packet does not list unique recipients or a median award.
Is this Georgia school-lunch poultry spending?
The packet does not break 131 awards by program. $123,455,489.22 is NAICS 311615 obligations with Georgia place of performance. School-lunch folklore is not a packet field. Quote poultry processing and Georgia together. Those figures are obligations, not outlays, and they are not every federal dollar coded to the state. Keep both sides of the join in the citation and leave unique vendors unpublished.
Where are the parent Georgia and NAICS 311615 tables?
Use Georgia federal spending for the statewide industry mix, NAICS 311615 for the national industry page, Georgia industries for the state NAICS index, and All spending ties for other joins. This page quotes only the 311615 × GA cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.