Skip to main content
← All data ties

Social Security Administration obligations in Indiana 8th District (IN-08)

Social Security Administration obligated $3,899,405,249 in Indiana 8th District (IN-08) on USAspending.gov, a 1,338-row awarding-agency 028 extract. One thousand three hundred thirty-eight SSA-coded awards cover about forty-four percent of IN-08’s district obligation total, a near-half Social Security column on a different Indiana stamp than IN-09, IN-05, and IN-07. That pair is Social Security Administration and Indiana 8th District (IN-08) — not Indiana’s entire federal inflow, not Social Security Administration nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 44.1% of this district’s published obligation total ($8,842,487,457.32). Implied average obligation is about $2,914,353.70 ($3,899,405,249 ÷ 1,338). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • SSA in Indiana 8th District (IN-08): $3,899,405,249 across 1,338 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $2,914,353.70 per record; district share 44.1% of $8,842,487,457.32.
  • Agency 028 × IN-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Indiana 8th District and Social Security Administration if live tables moved.
  • Indiana federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $3,899,405,249.

Two keys: awarding agency 028 and IN-08

Awarding agency 028 and congressional district IN-08 meet here. $3,899,405,249 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Social Security Administration’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Indiana 8th District (IN-08), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split OASDI, SSI, or contract versus assistance instruments. 1,338 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, a named-payee file, or a retirement-check register.

Dividing $3,899,405,249 by 1,338 yields about $2,914,353.70 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 1,338 awards is a thick SSA file. Treat the count as action records, not unique beneficiaries. Do not treat IN-08’s 028 cell as a synonym for every SSA account nationwide. Open Indiana 8th District for the district table without this agency filter, Social Security Administration for agency 028 without the IN-08 filter, Indiana federal spending for every awarding agency in the Indiana extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $3,899,405,249.

Agency 028 is a rollup, not a program catalog

USAspending labels awarding agency 028 as Social Security Administration. That code produced $3,899,405,249 when crossed with Indiana 8th District (IN-08) place of performance. The agency-wide 028 hub does not require IN-08 geography. The district hub does not require SSA. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 1,338 awards. The packet does not split OASDI, SSI, or contract versus assistance instruments.

Correlation is not causation: Indiana 8th District (IN-08) did not cause $3,899,405,249 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 028 × IN-08 only. It is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, a named-payee file, or a retirement-check register. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

IN-08 is a congressional code, not a city list

Indiana 8th District (IN-08) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list IN-08 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Indiana districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 028. Indiana 8th District (IN-08) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Indiana. Other Indiana districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 028. Indiana 8th District (IN-08) is a numbered place-of-performance code. Indiana 7th District’s SSA cell sits against a much larger district denominator on a separate page.

Indiana federal spending shows how agency 028 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $3,899,405,249 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split Indiana 8th District (IN-08) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Social Security Administration. The district-wide obligation total published here is $8,842,487,457.32; $3,899,405,249 is the SSA slice of that denominator.

Commitments recorded, not Treasury checks cleared

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $3,899,405,249 is that kind of sum for Social Security Administration inside IN-08 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $3,899,405,249 as given.

Footnoting agency 028 in Indiana 8th District (IN-08)

Cite USAspending.gov: Social Security Administration (agency 028) obligated $3,899,405,249 on 1,338 awards coded to Indiana 8th District (IN-08). Name Social Security Administration and Indiana 8th District (IN-08) together. Keep the obligation word. If Indiana 8th District or Social Security Administration has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, a named-payee file, or a retirement-check register. 44.1% of $8,842,487,457.32 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

A thick action file is still one cell

1,338 awards is a thick SSA file. Treat the count as action records, not unique beneficiaries. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $2,914,353.70) and the district share (44.1% of $8,842,487,457.32) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Indiana 8th District and Social Security Administration if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much SSA spending is coded to Indiana 8th District (IN-08)?
USAspending.gov lists $3,899,405,249 in SSA (agency 028) obligations across 1,338 awards coded to Indiana 8th District (IN-08). That pair is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Indiana’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 44.1% of the district’s published total ($8,842,487,457.32). Unique recipients are unpublished.
Does $3,899,405,249 include every SSA program in IN-08?
The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split OASDI, SSI, or contract versus assistance instruments. $3,899,405,249 is the combined obligation sum for agency 028 inside IN-08 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. 1,338 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $3,899,405,249 cash already paid in Indiana 8th District (IN-08)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $3,899,405,249 as checks already cleared in Indiana 8th District (IN-08) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 1,338 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Does award count 1,338 equal unique SSA vendors?
No. 1,338 is an action count on USAspending.gov awards tagged to agency 028 and IN-08. Modifications and continuations add rows. Unique vendors, payees, and offices are unpublished. The dollar total remains $3,899,405,249 in obligations, not outlays.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.