Social Security Disability Insurance in Alabama 3rd (AL-03)
USAspending.gov records $675,405,484 in Social Security Disability Insurance (CFDA 96.001) obligations with place of performance in Alabama 3rd District (AL-03), across 264 awards. Two hundred sixty-four SSDI awards equal about nine percent of AL-03’s district obligation total, a Social Security catalog line that is not a beneficiary headcount. That pair is Social Security Disability Insurance and Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) — not Alabama’s entire federal inflow, not Social Security Disability Insurance nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 8.9% of this district’s published obligation total ($7,586,307,781.50). Implied average obligation is about $2,558,354.11 ($675,405,484 ÷ 264). Correlation is not causation.
Key figures
- SSDI in Alabama 3rd District (AL-03): $675,405,484 across 264 USAspending awards.
- Implied mean about $2,558,354.11 per record; district share 8.9% of $7,586,307,781.50.
- CFDA 96.001 × AL-03 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
- Cite USAspending.gov; quote Alabama 3rd District and CFDA 96.001 if live tables moved.
- Alabama federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $675,405,484.
What the SSDI–AL-03 join is
CFDA 96.001 and congressional district AL-03 meet here. $675,405,484 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Social Security Disability Insurance’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Alabama 3rd District (AL-03), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split worker from dependent benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator. 264 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a beneficiary census, a claims roster, or a named-recipient file.
Dividing $675,405,484 by 264 yields about $2,558,354.11 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical monthly benefit or a posted per-beneficiary figure. 264 awards is a moderate SSDI file. Modifications add rows. Do not read 264 as named beneficiaries or SSA field offices. Do not treat AL-03’s 96.001 cell as a synonym for every SSDI account nationwide. Open Alabama 3rd District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 96.001 for CFDA 96.001 without the AL-03 filter, Alabama federal spending for every program in the Alabama extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $675,405,484.
CFDA 96.001 as the SSDI side
USAspending labels CFDA 96.001 as Social Security Disability Insurance. That catalog number produced $675,405,484 when crossed with Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) place of performance. The program-wide 96.001 hub does not require AL-03 geography. The district hub does not require SSDI. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 264 awards. The packet does not split worker from dependent benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator.
Correlation is not causation: Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) did not “cause” $675,405,484 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 96.001 × AL-03 only. It is not a beneficiary census, a claims roster, or a named-recipient file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.
Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) as place of performance
Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list AL-03 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Alabama districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 96.001. Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Alabama. Other Alabama districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 96.001. Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) is not Alabama 5th or 2nd. Those Alabama pairs on this slice use VA disability and Title I catalog lines, not CFDA 96.001.
Alabama federal spending shows how CFDA 96.001 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $675,405,484 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Social Security Disability Insurance. The district-wide obligation total published here is $7,586,307,781.50; $675,405,484 is the SSDI slice of that denominator.
Obligations, not outlays
USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $675,405,484 is that kind of sum for Social Security Disability Insurance inside AL-03 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $675,405,484 as given.
Alabama’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 264-row SSDI cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 264 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 264 is not a count of beneficiaries, claims, or SSA offices. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($2,558,354.11) is a concentration statistic, not a typical monthly benefit or a posted per-beneficiary figure.
How to cite SSDI in AL-03
Cite USAspending.gov: Social Security Disability Insurance (CFDA 96.001) obligated $675,405,484 on 264 awards coded to Alabama 3rd District (AL-03). Name Social Security Disability Insurance and Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) together. Keep the obligation word. If Alabama 3rd District or CFDA 96.001 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a beneficiary census, a claims roster, or a named-recipient file. 8.9% of $7,586,307,781.50 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Mississippi also host SSDI pairs on this slice; each geography is a separate join.
Keep Social Security Disability Insurance, Alabama 3rd District (AL-03), $675,405,484, and 264 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. CFDA 96.001 is the 96.001 parent without a AL-03 filter. Alabama federal spending is the Alabama parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with SSDI does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.
Reading a moderate SSDI file in AL-03
264 awards is a moderate SSDI file. Modifications add rows. Do not read 264 as named beneficiaries or SSA field offices. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $2,558,354.11) and the district share (8.9% of $7,586,307,781.50) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Alabama 3rd District and CFDA 96.001 if the live tables moved.
Questions
- How much SSDI spending is coded to Alabama 3rd District (AL-03)?
- USAspending.gov lists $675,405,484 in Social Security Disability Insurance obligations across 264 awards with place of performance in Alabama 3rd District (AL-03). CFDA 96.001 × AL-03 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Alabama’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 8.9% of the district’s published total ($7,586,307,781.50). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $2,558,354.11, a ratio of those two facts only.
- Does $675,405,484 include every SSDI project in AL-03?
- The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split worker from dependent benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator. $675,405,484 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 96.001 inside AL-03 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 96.001 and Alabama 3rd District to inspect parent tables. 264 remains an action count, not a count of beneficiaries, claims, or SSA offices.
- Is $675,405,484 cash already paid in Alabama 3rd District (AL-03)?
- No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $675,405,484 as checks already cleared in Alabama 3rd District (AL-03) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 264 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
- Where is the live SSDI–AL-03 table?
- Alabama 3rd District is the district parent and CFDA 96.001 is the program parent. Alabama federal spending covers Alabama without the district×program intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $675,405,484. Place of performance is AL-03. Obligations are not outlays.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.