Skip to main content
← All data ties

Special Education Grants To States in Washington 10th District (WA-10)

The Special Education Grants × WA-10 cell on USAspending.gov is $551,136,446 in obligations across 2 awards. Two formula-style rows against a $551,136,446 IDEA book is a state-agency vehicle tagged to WA-10, not two school districts and not a pupil census. The pair is about 4.5% of the district’s $12,185,220,009.15 all-program obligation total in this extract. The dollars are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Special Education Grants To States in Washington 10th District (WA-10): $551,136,446 across 2 awards.
  • About 4.5% of the district’s $12,185,220,009.15 all-program obligation total.
  • Average obligation per award is about $275,568,223 (ratio only).
  • The join is CFDA 84.027 × Washington 10th District (WA-10) place of performance, not a local special-education budget or a pupil count.
  • Figures are USAspending obligations, not outlays.

WA-10 × 84.027 is an IDEA join, not an IEP count

This page is a join: Special Education Grants To States and Washington 10th District (WA-10). $551,136,446 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 84.027 tag and congressional-district place of performance WA-10. It is not Washington’s statewide Special Education Grants To States book, not the nationwide program total, and not a local special-education budget or a pupil count. Washington 10th District is the district parent. CFDA 84.027 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

2 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $551,136,446 by 2 yields about $275,568,223 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical per-pupil IDEA allocation. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. IDEA Part B state grants often post as a handful of assistance rows. Olympia folklore is not a named ESD list.

Special Education Grants to States as a catalog title

The official catalog title is SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES. SpendingVault does not grade Washington 10th District (WA-10) on Special Education Grants To States, backlog, or policy. $551,136,446 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 84.027 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Title I (84.010) or other ED formula listings remain outside $551,136,446.

IDEA child-count tables and state education-agency dashboards are other series. They are not the 2 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. IDEA caseload and OSPI-pass-through folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. WI-02 and LA-06 also carry 84.027 in this slice. Matching CFDA codes do not merge those state-agency vehicles into WA-10. Title I on 84.010 stays outside this cell.

Washington 10th District besides CFDA 84.027

Washington 10th District (WA-10) is the geography side. Place of performance WA-10 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Washington federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. South Sound speech is not a county school map. Neighboring WA-06 IDEA cells stay outside. A Special Education Grants To States award tagged to WA-06 or WA-08 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $12,185,220,009.15. $551,136,446 is the Special Education Grants To States slice of that book, about 4.5%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Washington 10th District, not inside this join. Quoting $551,136,446 as Washington 10th District (WA-10)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Two awards, not two local educational agencies

2 awards against $551,136,446 implies about $275,568,223 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical per-pupil IDEA allocation. Formula assistance awards to a state education agency can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 2. 2 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 2 finished projects or 2 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Formula obligations versus reimbursements already drawn

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $551,136,446 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Washington 10th District (WA-10) over-reads the field. Do not rank Washington 10th District (WA-10) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Special Education Grants To States (CFDA 84.027) and Washington 10th District (WA-10).

Budget documents from the Olympia–Tacoma South Sound communities as speech only and Washington appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 84.027 in WA-10, the chart has left the federal award series. The South Sound as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $551,136,446 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 84.027 × WA-10 pair

Cite: Special Education Grants To States (CFDA 84.027) obligated $551,136,446 on 2 awards coded to Washington 10th District (WA-10), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Washington 10th District for the district rollup, CFDA 84.027 for the program rollup, Washington federal spending for Washington statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 2-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into a local special-education budget or a pupil count, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Special Education Grants To States funding is obligated in Washington 10th District (WA-10)?
USAspending.gov records $551,136,446 in CFDA 84.027 obligations with Washington 10th District (WA-10) place of performance across 2 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Washington’s full federal total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Do 2 awards mean 2 local student, IEP,s?
No. 2 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $275,568,223 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical per-pupil IDEA allocation. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Is this Washington 10th District (WA-10)’s entire federal spending total?
No. $551,136,446 is only the Special Education Grants To States slice tagged to Washington 10th District (WA-10), about 4.5% of the district’s $12,185,220,009.15 all-program total. Washington federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Washington 10th District sit outside this join.
How should a citation name Special Education Grants and WA-10?
Name Special Education Grants To States (CFDA 84.027) and Washington 10th District (WA-10) in the same sentence. Keep the obligation word. Quote Washington 10th District and CFDA 84.027 if later ingests restated $551,136,446. All spending ties indexes other pairs without adding them into this cell.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.