South Carolina 2nd District

A place-of-performance join: NAICS 561612 × SC-02

Congressional district SC-02 and NAICS 561612 meet here. $1,385,671,840.15 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Security Guards And Patrol Services's nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance. 3 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not a guard headcount, a post roster, or a named-vendor file.

This page reports security guards and patrol services activity USAspending tagged to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02). The headline $1,385,671,840.15 sits beside a district-wide obligation total of $38,716,870,492.45; the 3.6% share is arithmetic on those two packet facts, not a ranking of South Carolina districts as winners or losers. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. Obligations are not outlays. Security guards is a services NAICS, not facilities support 561210 used on VA-09 and AK-00 in this slice.

Security Guards And Patrol Services as an industry code, not as a named-vendor list

USAspending labels NAICS 561612 as Security Guards And Patrol Services. That code produced $1,385,671,840.15 when crossed with South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) place of performance. The industry-wide 561612 hub does not require SC-02 geography. The district hub does not require Security Guards. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 3 awards. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance.

Correlation is not causation: South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) did not cause $1,385,671,840.15 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 561612 × SC-02 only. This cell is not a guard headcount, a post roster, or a named-vendor file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Questions

How much Security Guards spending is coded to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)?

USAspending.gov lists $1,385,671,840.15 in Security Guards And Patrol Services obligations across 3 awards with place of performance in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02). NAICS 561612 × SC-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Carolina's complete federal ledger. The cell is 3.6% of the district's published total ($38,716,870,492.45). Unique recipients are unpublished.

Does $1,385,671,840.15 include every Security Guards program in SC-02?

The packet publishes one NAICS rollup. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance. $1,385,671,840.15 is the combined obligation sum for NAICS 561612 inside SC-02 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open NAICS 561612 and South Carolina 2nd District to inspect parent tables. 3 remains an action count, not a program count.

Is $1,385,671,840.15 cash already paid in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet's headline. Treating $1,385,671,840.15 as checks already cleared in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 3 awards. Prefer the live district and industry hubs if the tables moved.

Is South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) ranked against other South Carolina districts here?

No. This page does not rank South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) as a winner or loser. $1,385,671,840.15 and 3 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Security Guards And Patrol Services and South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) together without a league table.