Security Guards and Patrol Services in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)

A place-of-performance join: NAICS 561612 × SC-02

Congressional district SC-02 and NAICS 561612 meet here. $1,385,671,840.15 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Security Guards And Patrol Services's nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance. 3 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not a guard headcount, a post roster, or a named-vendor file.

This page reports security guards and patrol services activity USAspending tagged to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02). The headline $1,385,671,840.15 sits beside a district-wide obligation total of $38,716,870,492.45; the 3.6% share is arithmetic on those two packet facts, not a ranking of South Carolina districts as winners or losers. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. Obligations are not outlays. Security guards is a services NAICS, not facilities support 561210 used on VA-09 and AK-00 in this slice.

Security Guards And Patrol Services as an industry code, not as a named-vendor list

USAspending labels NAICS 561612 as Security Guards And Patrol Services. That code produced $1,385,671,840.15 when crossed with South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) place of performance. The industry-wide 561612 hub does not require SC-02 geography. The district hub does not require Security Guards. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 3 awards. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance.

Correlation is not causation: South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) did not cause $1,385,671,840.15 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 561612 × SC-02 only. This cell is not a guard headcount, a post roster, or a named-vendor file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Place of performance for South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)

South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list SC-02 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other South Carolina districts belong on those ties even when the industry is also NAICS 561612. South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) is a numbered place-of-performance code. Other South Carolina districts are separate joins.

/states/sc/ shows how NAICS 561612 sits beside other industries in the same state extract. $1,385,671,840.15 is one district-industry column, not the state table. This packet does not split South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different NAICS stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Security Guards And Patrol Services. The district-wide obligation total published here is $38,716,870,492.45; $1,385,671,840.15 is the Security Guards slice of that denominator.

Obligation math for this join

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $1,385,671,840.15 is that kind of sum for Security Guards And Patrol Services inside SC-02 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same NAICS rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $1,385,671,840.15 as given.

What a complete citation includes

Cite USAspending.gov: Security Guards And Patrol Services (NAICS 561612) obligated $1,385,671,840.15 on 3 awards coded to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02). Name Security Guards And Patrol Services and South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) together. Keep the obligation word. If /districts/SC-02/ or /industries/561612/ has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a guard headcount, a post roster, or a named-vendor file. 3.6% of $38,716,870,492.45 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Using 3.6% and $461,890,613.38 without overclaiming

3 awards is an extremely thin services file. Armed versus unarmed splits are unpublished. Unique vendors are unpublished. A three-row file makes a named-contractor story tempting; the packet still does not name contractors. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $461,890,613.38) and the district share (3.6% of $38,716,870,492.45) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer /districts/SC-02/ and /industries/561612/ if the live tables moved. Security guards is a services NAICS, not facilities support 561210 used on VA-09 and AK-00 in this slice.

Do not rank South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) as more Security Guards-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 561612 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 561612 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $1,385,671,840.15 and 3 only. /ties/ is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. A reader who only quotes $1,385,671,840.15 without South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) and NAICS 561612 has dropped a join side.

Questions

How much Security Guards spending is coded to South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)?

USAspending.gov lists $1,385,671,840.15 in Security Guards And Patrol Services obligations across 3 awards with place of performance in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02). NAICS 561612 × SC-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Carolina's complete federal ledger. The cell is 3.6% of the district's published total ($38,716,870,492.45). Unique recipients are unpublished.

Does $1,385,671,840.15 include every Security Guards program in SC-02?

The packet publishes one NAICS rollup. The packet does not split armed versus unarmed posts, or contract versus assistance. $1,385,671,840.15 is the combined obligation sum for NAICS 561612 inside SC-02 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open NAICS 561612 and South Carolina 2nd District to inspect parent tables. 3 remains an action count, not a program count.

Is $1,385,671,840.15 cash already paid in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet's headline. Treating $1,385,671,840.15 as checks already cleared in South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 3 awards. Prefer the live district and industry hubs if the tables moved.

Is South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) ranked against other South Carolina districts here?

No. This page does not rank South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) as a winner or loser. $1,385,671,840.15 and 3 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Security Guards And Patrol Services and South Carolina 2nd District (SC-02) together without a league table.