Texas 8th District

Six Deep Sea Freight awards tagged to Texas 8th District (TX-08)

NAICS 483111 and congressional district TX-08 meet here. $880,948,832.85 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Deep Sea Freight Transportation's nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Texas 8th District (TX-08), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split liner from tramp from other 483111 ocean-freight work, and it does not split contract versus assistance. 6 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not named ships, terminals, or a ranking of Texas districts as port winners.

This page reports Deep Sea Freight awards USAspending tagged to this district as place of performance. The headline $880,948,832.85 sits beside a district-wide obligation total of $2,367,097,364.42; the 37.2% share is arithmetic on those two packet facts, not a ranking of Texas districts as winners or losers. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Obligations are not outlays. TX-21 Computer Services and TX-35 Wired Telecommunications in this harvest are other industries. Mixing them into 483111 would invent a combined Texas logistics figure.

NAICS 483111 as a water-freight catalog code, not a vessel list

NAICS 483111 is Deep Sea Freight Transportation. The industry tag does not name carriers, terminals, or vessels. This packet lists none of them. That catalog produced $880,948,832.85 when crossed with Texas 8th District (TX-08) place of performance. The industry-wide 483111 hub does not require TX-08 geography. The district hub does not require Deep Sea Freight. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 6 awards. The packet does not split liner from tramp from other 483111 ocean-freight work, and it does not split contract versus assistance.

Correlation is not causation: Texas 8th District (TX-08) did not cause $880,948,832.85 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 483111 × TX-08 only. This cell is not named ships, terminals, or a ranking of Texas districts as port winners. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate. Six records against this dollar book is a concentrated freight file. Mean obligation is a quotient, not a published vessel budget.

Questions

How much Deep Sea Freight spending is coded to Texas 8th District (TX-08)?

USAspending.gov lists $880,948,832.85 in Deep Sea Freight Transportation obligations across 6 awards with place of performance in Texas 8th District (TX-08). NAICS 483111 × TX-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Texas's complete federal ledger. The cell is 37.2% of the district's published total ($2,367,097,364.42). Unique recipients are unpublished.

Do 6 awards mean 6 deep-sea vessels in TX-08?

No. Award count is a row count of USAspending awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of ships, terminals, or named carriers. The packet does not name recipients. Mean obligation of about $146,824,805.47 is a quotient, not a typical published award. Open NAICS 483111 and Texas 8th District to inspect parents.

Is this Texas's entire NAICS 483111 obligation book?

No. The join is NAICS 483111 crossed with TX-08 place of performance. The district-wide book on this extract is $2,367,097,364.42. Related industrys and other districts are not inside $880,948,832.85 unless they also carry both keys. Confusing this join with a statewide freight total or a TX-21 residual-IT overlay would be a different overlay.

Do FEC donations fund these Deep Sea Freight awards in TX-08?

No. FEC receipts and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing Texas geography does not mean donations funded $880,948,832.85 in Texas 8th District (TX-08). This page reports USAspending.gov NAICS 483111 crossed with place of performance TX-08. It does not report campaign finance.