Utah District 90 (non-voting)

What District 90 means in USAspending

USAspending uses 90 and 98 as unspecified or non-voting congressional-district codes on place of performance. For Utah, 90 is that residual bin. The FY2024 obligation sum in the bin is $24.5 billion. The award count is 6,037.

Do not read UT-90 as “the 90th district of Utah.” Utah’s House seats are numbered far below 90. The code marks awards whose Utah performance location was not assigned to a standard numbered district field. It is a dataset bucket sitting on top of Utah place of performance.

Six thousand thirty-seven rows in a residual file

Six thousand thirty-seven awards is a defined file for a leftover geography code. Those rows still sum to a defined dollar total: $24.5 billion in FY2024 obligations. Row count is not unique vendors. The same recipient can appear on many awards.

This packet does not provide a unique-recipient count or an agency split. Use the hub table to see how the 6,037 records break out; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.

Questions

How much did USAspending record for Utah District 90 in FY2024?

USAspending.gov shows $24.5 billion in FY2024 obligations for Utah District 90 place of performance, across 6,037 awards. Code 90 is an unspecified or non-voting bucket. The figures are obligations, not outlays, and cover FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with UT-90 place of performance, covering 6,037 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.

Does Utah have a 90th congressional district?

No. USAspending’s 90 code is an unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance bucket in the award data. It is not a House seat voters elect. The $24.5 billion total is a residual geography code for Utah performance location on 6,037 awards. Keep $24.5 billion and 6,037 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.

Why are there 6,037 awards on this page?

That is the FY2024 award count USAspending ties to the UT-90 place-of-performance code. It is a record count, not a unique-vendor count. Those records sum to $24.5 billion in obligations. The packet does not break the file into agencies or award types.

If a contractor is based in Utah, is the award on this page?

Only if place of performance is coded UT-90. Headquarters in Utah is not the district field. Work performed in a numbered Utah district or another state will not sit in this $24.5 billion total even when the recipient’s office is in Utah.